Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fletcher v TNT Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 981 Citation: Fletcher v TNT Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 981
Appeal from: Fletcher and TNT Australia Pty Ltd [2013] AATA 173
Parties: ROBIN FLETCHER v TNT AUSTRALIA PTY LTD, ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL and COMCARE
File number(s): NSD 560 of 2013
Judge(s): BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 11 September 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for judicial review under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – where applicant fails to prosecute the appeal – where applicant is absent when the appeal is called – whether appeal competent COSTS – indemnity costs sought against applicant – where offer of compromise made – where unreasonably refused by applicant – where applicant is self-represented
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 44 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 1.34, 25.01, 25.14, 25.14(2), 33.32, 33.33 Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth), s 5A(1)
Cases cited: Fletcher and TNT Australia Pty Ltd [2013] AATA 173 Fletcher v TNT Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 725 Hamod v New South Wales (2002) 188 ALR 659 Manolakis v Carter [2008] FCAFC 183 Ogawa v University of Melbourne (No 2) [2004] FCA 1275 Rahman v Ashpole [2007] FCA 883
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate