Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MHM Metals Ltd v Rogers [2014] FCA 1006 Citation: MHM Metals Ltd v Rogers [2014] FCA 1006
Parties: MHM METALS LTD (ACN 124 212 175) v FRANK ARTHUR ROGERS and ROGERS SOUTHERN PTY LTD (ACN 009 069 541)
File number(s): VID 1272 of 2013
Judge(s): DAVIES J
Date of judgment: 18 September 2014
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – director's duties – misappropriation of company funds by a director – ss 181, 182, 183 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) contravened – second respondent knowingly participated in the misappropriations REMEDIES – election for compensation under s 1317H of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – relevant principles for determining compensable damage under this provision
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 79(c), 181, 182, 183, 208, 1317H
Cases cited: Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd (in liq) (2001) 207 CLR 165 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170; [1992] HCA 66 Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89 Rowland v Divall [1923] 2 KB 500 Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344 V-Flow Pty Limited v Holyoake Industries (Vic) Pty Limited [2013] FCAFC 16 Chameleon Mining NL v Murchison Metals Limited [2010] FCA 1129 Date of hearing: 14, 15 and 16 May 2014
Date of last submissions: 27 May 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate