Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lloyd Helicopters Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2014] FCA 1009 Citation: Lloyd Helicopters Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2014] FCA 1009
Parties: LLOYD HELICOPTERS PTY LTD v CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY, DESMOND JOHN BYFIELD and GREG DEAL
File number(s): NSD 828 of 2014
Judge(s): GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 16 September 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for judicial review – interlocutory hearing – dispute as to discovery categories – hearing premature.
Date of hearing: 16 September 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the applicant: Mr T Brennan
Solicitor for the applicant: Norton White
Counsel for the respondents: Mr B Shields
Solicitor for the respondents: Legal Branch Civil Aviation Safety Authority
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 828 of 2014
BETWEEN: LLOYD HELICOPTERS PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY
First Respondent
DESMOND JOHN BYFIELD
Second Respondent
GREG DEAL
Third Respondent
JUDGE: GRIFFITHS J DATE OF ORDER: 16 SEPTEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant pay the respondents' costs of and incidental to today's hearing. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 828 of 2014
BETWEEN: LLOYD HELICOPTERS PTY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate