Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Essendon Football Club v Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority [2014] FCA 1019 Citation: Essendon Football Club v Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority [2014] FCA 1019
Parties: ESSENDON FOOTBALL CLUB (ACN 004 286 373) v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE AUSTRALIAN SPORTS ANTI-DOPING AUTHORITY JAMES ALBERT HIRD v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE AUSTRALIAN SPORTS ANTI-DOPING AUTHORITY
File number(s): VID 327 of 2014 VID 328 of 2014
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 19 September 2014
Catchwords: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – general principles – principle of legality – identification of statutory purpose – approach when statute based upon international conventions and agreements – modern approach to statutory interpretation – express statutory powers and incidental powers. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether power used for improper purpose – test to apply when multiple purposes. JUDICIAL REVIEW – nature of judicial review – whether relief is discretionary – delay – acquiescence – utility – inevitable outcome – impropriety of applicant – public policy. PRIVILEGE – nature of privilege against self-incrimination – contractual abrogation or curtailment –statutory abrogation or curtailment – need to invoke privilege against self-incrimination – limitations on extent of protection given by privilege against self-incrimination. WORDS AND PHRASES – "in connection with" – "for the purposes of".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate