Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Quigley v Lunchalot Club Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1025 Citation: Quigley v Lunchalot Club Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1025
Parties: SHANE QUIGLEY v LUNCHALOT CLUB PTY LTD (ACN 154 977 885) and RICHARD TENSER
File number: NSD 1750 of 2013
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 23 September 2014
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 r 15.04(b)
Cases cited: Chen v Karandonis [2002] NSWCA 412 cited Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No 2) [1982] 1 Ch 204 cited Vplus Holdings Pty Ltd v Bank of Western Australia Ltd (2012) 91 ACSR 545 cited
Date of hearing: 12 September 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr SA Wells
Solicitor for the Applicant: Lazarus Legal Group Pty Ltd
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr M Bennett
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1750 of 2013
BETWEEN: SHANE QUIGLEY
Applicant
AND: LUNCHALOT CLUB PTY LTD (ACN 154 977 885)
First Respondent
RICHARD TENSER
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J DATE OF ORDER: 23 SEPTEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Insofar as leave is required, the second respondent have leave to file a Notice of Cross-Claim and a Statement of Cross-Claim in the forms annexed "RT-14" to the affidavit of Richard Tenser sworn 11 August 2014. 2. Costs of the application be costs in the cause. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate