Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bell v Taylor [2014] FCA 1033 Citation: Bell v Taylor [2014] FCA 1033
Parties: CARL WILLIAM BELL v BARRY ANTHONY TAYLOR and COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA (ACN 123 123 124)
File number(s): WAD 234 of 2014
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 15 September 2014
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application by bankrupt for leave to amend an originating application to add a claim to stay the execution of orders for vacant possession of his properties made by the Supreme Court of Western Australia – whether the bankrupt required the consent of his trustee in bankruptcy to bring such a claim.
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 58, 60, 60(1)(b), 60(4)
Cases cited: Bell v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2014] FCA 934
Date of hearing: 15 September 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person.
Counsel for the Ms K Britton First Respondent:
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Gadens Lawyers
Counsel for the Ms K Pallas Second Respondent:
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 234 of 2014
BETWEEN: CARL WILLIAM BELL
Applicant
AND: BARRY ANTHONY TAYLOR
First Respondent
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA (ACN 123 123 124)
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate