Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Croker v Segal [2014] FCA 1044 Citation: Croker v Segal [2014] FCA 1044
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Croker v Segal [2014] FCA 944
Parties: CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER v GEOFF SEGAL (A DEPUTY DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA)
File number: NSD 882 of 2014
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 25 September 2014
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1D)(b), s 31A Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 178
Cases cited: Croker v Minister for Finance [2013] FCAFC 154 cited Daemar v Industrial Commission of New South Wales (1988) 12 NSWLR 45 cited Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2008) 171 FCR 380 cited
Date of hearing: 25 September 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 2
Solicitor for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr Abood of the Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 882 of 2014
BETWEEN: CLAYTON ROBERT CROKER
Applicant
AND: GEOFF SEGAL (A DEPUTY DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA)
Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 25 SEPTEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed with costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 882 of 2014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate