Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Agapis v Plumbers Licensing Board (No 2) [2014] FCA 1045 Citation: Agapis v Plumbers Licensing Board (No 2) [2014] FCA 1045
Parties: RAOUL AGAPIS v PLUMBERS LICENSING BOARD
File number: WAD 460 of 2013
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 26 September 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by appellant for leave to amend grounds of appeal - application by respondent for orders pursuant to s 37AO of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether or not the appellant has frequently instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings in Australian courts or tribunals – relevant principles
Legislation: Constitution Ch III High Court Rules (Cth) O 63 r 6 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AM(1), 37AO Mutual Recognition Act 1992 (Cth)
Cases cited: Agapis v The State of Western Australia [2012] WASCA 132 Attorney General of NSW v Wilson [2010] NSWSC 1008 Agapis v Plumbers Licensing Board [2013] FCA 1221 Attorney General v Chan [2011] NSWSC 1315 Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577 Fuller v Toms [2013] FCA 1422 HWY Rent Pty Ltd v HWY Rentals (in liq) (No 2) [2014] FCA 449 Jones v Cusack (1992) 109 ALR 313 Jones v Skyring (1992) 109 ALR 303 Ramsey v Skyring (1999) 164 ALR 378 Raoul Agapis and Plumbers Licensing Board [2013] AATA 187 In re Vernazza [1960] 1 QB 197 Singh v The Owners Strata Plan 11723 [2013] NSWSC 1595
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate