Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Zen Telecom Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1049 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Zen Telecom Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1049
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v ZEN TELECOM PTY LTD (ACN 159 057 566)
File number: WAD 42 of 2014
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 30 September 2014
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – admitted contraventions of Australian Consumer Law (Cth) ss 18(1), 29(1)(g), 29(1)(h), 78(2), 79(b)(i), 79(b)(ii), 79(c)(i), 79(d)(iv), 86(1)(a) – joint submissions and statement of agreed facts and admissions – whether orders sought by consent appropriate in the circumstances – declaratory relief, injunctions, pecuniary penalties, compliance program, publication orders, costs
Legislation: Australian Consumer Law (Cth) (Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) s 18, s 18(1), s 29(1)(g), s 29(1)(h), s 69, s 71, s 78(2), s 79(b)(i), s 79(b)(ii), s 79(c)(i), s 79(d)(iv), s 86(1)(a), s 224, s 224(2), s 232, s 246, s 246(2)(b)(i), s 246(2)(d) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 191 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21, s 43 Competition and Consumer Regulations 2010 (Cth) reg 85
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd (1997) 145 ALR 36 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 146; (2007) 161 FCR 513 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v EnergyAustralia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 336; [2014] ATPR 42-469 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Global One Mobile Entertainment Limited [2011] FCA 393; [2011] ATPR 42-358 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v High Adventure Pty Limited [2005] FCAFC 247; [2006] ATPR 42-091 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mandurvit Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 464; [2014] ATPR 42-471 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Neighbourhood Energy Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1357; [2012] ATPR 42-426 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pirovic Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 1028 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc [1999] FCA 1387; (1999) 95 FCR 114 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc [1999] FCA 18; (1999) 161 ALR 79 Australian Competition and Consumer Competition v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1272; (2010) 276 ALR 102 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Startel Communication Co Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 352; [2014] ATPR 42-465 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Target Australia Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1326 Barbaro v The Queen; Zirilli v The Queen [2014] HCA 2; (2014) 88 ALJR 372 Cassidy v Medical Benefits Fund of Australia (No 2) [2002] FCA 1097; [2002] ATPR 41-892 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; (2010) 194 IR 461 Forster v Jododex [1972] HCA 61; (1972) 127 CLR 421 Minister for Industry, Tourism & Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 72; [2004] ATPR 41-993 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; (2012) 287 ALR 249 Tax Practitioners Board v Dedic [2014] FCA 511 Thomson Australian Holdings Proprietary Limited v Trade Practices Commission (1981) 148 CLR 150 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1991] ATPR 41-076
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate