Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Katke v Brosnan [2014] FCA 1050 Citation: Katke v Brosnan [2014] FCA 1050
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Brosnan v Katke [2014] FCA 974
Parties: JEFFREY JAMES KATKE, METAGENICS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 113 937 572, METAGENICS INC and JEFFREY BLAND v MICHAEL BROSNAN, LEON BROSNAN, MARY BROSNAN, ALAN GEE, ALAN BAWDEN GRANT, BARBARA LEE GRANT, ALAN DAVID GRANT, MICHAEL CURLEY, GRAEME JOINER and HEALTH WORLD LIMITED ACN 010 636 165
File number: QUD 510 of 2014
Judges: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 25 September 2014
Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – application for leave to appeal – asset preservation orders – mandatory interlocutory injunctions made against third party pending judgment – leave to appeal granted – expedition refused
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 4, 25(2B)(c), 37M, 37P Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199 cited British American Tobacco Australia Limited v Secretary, Department of Health and Ageing [2011] FCA 718 cited DÉcor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 cited Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564 cited Minogue v Williams [2000] FCA 125; (2000) 60 ALD 366 cited Paul's Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCA 724 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate