Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Raytheon Company v Lockheed Martin Corporation [2014] FCA 1063 Citation: Raytheon Company v Lockheed Martin Corporation [2014] FCA 1063
Parties: RAYTHEON COMPANY v LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
File number: NSD 1941 of 2012
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 2 October 2014
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 56
Cases cited: Societe Des Produits Nestle SA v Aldi Stores (A Limited Partnership) [2010] FCA 218 cited Suyen Corporation v Americana International Limited [2011] FCA 300 cited
Date of hearing: 2 October 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr RJ Webb SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Thomson Geer
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms F Marks
Solicitor for the Respondent: Logie-Smith Lanyon
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1941 of 2012
BETWEEN: RAYTHEON COMPANY
Applicant
AND: LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 2 OCTOBER 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS, BY CONSENT, THAT:
1. The appeal from the decision of the delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks given on 7 November 2012 in respect of Australian trade mark application No. 1065708 be allowed. 2. The decision be set aside. 3. Trade mark application No. 1065708, the subject of the appeal, proceed to registration. 4. No order is made as to costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate