Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BGC (Australia) Pty Ltd v Fremantle Port Authority [2014] FCA 1083 Citation: BGC (Australia) Pty Ltd v Fremantle Port Authority [2014] FCA 1083
Parties: BGC (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ABN 62 005 736 005) v FREMANTLE PORT AUTHORITY FREMANTLE PORT AUTHORITY v BGC (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ABN 62 005 736 005)
File number(s): WAD 284 of 2011
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 9 October 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to issue subpoena for the production of documents – whether there was a legitimate forensic purpose for issuing the subpoena.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M(1) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 51AC Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2 s 21
Cases cited: Wong v Sklavos [2014] FCAFC 120
Date of hearing: 10 September 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 28
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J Thomson SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: King & Wood Mallesons
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Goldblatt
Solicitor for the Respondent: Jackson McDonald
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 284 of 2011
BETWEEN: BGC (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ABN 62 005 736 005)
Applicant
AND: FREMANTLE PORT AUTHORITY
Respondent
and BETWEEN FREMANTLE PORT AUTHORITY
Cross Claimant
AND: BGC (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ABN 62 005 736 005)
Cross Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate