Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Anderson v XLVII [2014] FCA 1089 Citation: Anderson v XLVII [2014] FCA 1089
Parties: JEFFREY PHILIP ANDERSON v XLVII
File number: SAD 47 of 2014
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 10 October 2014
Catchwords: JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL COURT – Whether Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine applications by an examiner under s 34B of the Australian Crime Commission Act (2002) (Cth) to have a person dealt with for contempt of the Australian Crime Commission by refusing to answer a question required by the examiner
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 15C Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), s 63 Australian Constitution, ss 51, 71, 80, Chs I, III Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth), ss 4, 7A, 7C, 12(1), 20, 21, 22, 28, 30, 30(6), 31, 31A, 33, 34A, 34A(a)(ii), 34B, 34C, 34D, 35, 35, 35A, 36A, 37, 38, 39, 40, 46, 46B, Div3 Pt3 Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth), s 66 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 4G, Div 3 Pt II Criminal Code, Ch 2, Ch II, Pts 9.1, 9.4, ss 147.1 and 147.2 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Customs Act 1901 (Cth) Defence Act 1903 (Cth), s 89 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 35 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 19, 19(1), 31 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), Pt 42 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), ss24, 78A, 78B Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 372, 434 Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 (Cth), s 81 Royal Commissions Act 1902 (Cth), s 6O
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate