Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rana v Australian Human Rights Commission [2014] FCA 1093 Citation: Rana v Australian Human Rights Commission [2014] FCA 1093
Parties: RANJIT SHAMSHER JUNG BAHADUR RANA v AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION and DEAKIN UNIVERSITY
File numbers: SAD 87 of 2014 SAD 95 of 2014
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 10 October 2014
Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – whether Australian Human Rights Commission had denied applicant procedural fairness or had failed to discharge its functions under the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) – Australian Human Rights Commission consent to orders setting aside its decision
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), ss 5, 16(1) Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39
Cases cited: Rana v Deakin University [2014] FCA 1092
Date of hearing: 19 August 2014
Date of last submissions: 2 October 2014
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate