Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Slaveski v Rotstein & Associates Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1094 Citation: Slaveski v Rotstein & Associates Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1094
Appeal from: Rotstein & Associates Pty Ltd v Slaveski [2014] FCCA 1393
Parties: LJUPCO SLAVESKI v ROTSTEIN & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (ACN 117 539 063)
File number: VID 337 of 2014
Judge: BEACH J
Date of judgment: 8 October 2014
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – appeal against sequestration order – refusal to grant adjournment – grounds of appeal of no substance – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 40(1)(g), 58(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(1AA)(a)
Cases cited: Sali v SPC Limited (1993) 116 ALR 625
Date of hearing: 7 October 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 33
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear. Ms S Slaveski, appeared on behalf of the Appellant.
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr D Huang of Rotstein & Associates Pty Ltd
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 337 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: LJUPCO SLAVESKI
Appellant
AND: ROTSTEIN & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (ACN 117 539 063)
Respondent
JUDGE: BEACH J DATE OF ORDER: 8 OCTOBER 2014 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Appellant's appeal against the judgment and orders of the Federal Circuit Court constituted by Judge Riethmuller on 29 May 2014 is dismissed. 2. The Respondent's reasonable costs of and incidental to this appeal are to be treated as costs in the Appellant's bankruptcy in accordance with Section 109(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate