Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Murphy v Westpac Banking Corporation [2014] FCA 1104 Citation: Murphy v Westpac Banking Corporation [2014] FCA 1104
Parties: LOUISE MURPHY v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION STUART MOORE v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION DANIELLE LAVARS v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION COREY WITTENBERG v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION WILLIAM LAWSON v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION LUCKY POULOS v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION PAUL SMITH v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION
File number(s): NSD 1157 of 2009, NSD 384 of 2010, NSD 31 of 2010, NSD 90 of 2010, NSD 690 of 2010, NSD 1980 of 2011, NSD 1839 of 2011
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 14 October 2014
Catchwords: CONTRACTS - contracts of employment - misleading or deceptive conduct - ss 52 and 53B of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) - retention incentive scheme - whether employer disclosed true nature of scheme to employees - whether alleged non-disclosure of scheme amounted to deceit or negligence on part of employer - whether employee enjoyed contractual rights to bonus or incentive - relevance of discretion to award bonus or incentive - whether implied term that such discretion cannot be exercised capriciously, arbitrarily or unreasonably - whether withholding of incentives from employees a discretion so exercised - whether implied term of mutual trust and confidence - application of Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker [2014] HCA 32; (2014) 88 ALJR 84 - whether scheme induced employees not to seek alternative employment - whether incentives available to employees upon retrenchment CONTRACTS - contracts of employment - seconded employees - application and interpretation of secondment policy - whether seconded employees in temporary or permanent position CONTRACTS - contracts of employment - termination - whether reasonable notice given - meaning of "reasonable notice" - whether change in employee duties over time effects contractual variation of notice provisions - application of Quinn v Jack Chia (1991) 1 VR 567 CONTRACTS - contracts of employment - wrongful dismissal claims - whether employer redundancy policy forms part of terms and conditions of contract of employment - construction and interpretation of redundancy policy - whether application of policy varies over time - whether employee secondment affects application of redundancy policy - whether payment in lieu of notice acceptable DAMAGES - measure of damages - breach of contract of employment - damages in respect of contractual bonuses - quantification of the value of a lost opportunity TORTS - negligence - whether representatives of employer owed duty of care to employees - whether employer acted with reasonable care - quantification of loss on the part of employee
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate