Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ogden v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCA 1111 Citation: Ogden v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCA 1111
Appeal from: Garry Ogden v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] AATA 385
Parties: GARY OGDEN v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: NSD 677 of 2014
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 16 October 2014
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – taxation – appeal from decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal allegedly pursuant to s 44(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – question of fact and degree only – whether notice of appeal competent – Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 8-1 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – failure to articulate precise question of law in notice of appeal – applicant represented by person who is a non-legal practitioner – Federal Court Rules 2011 r 33.12
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 20A Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 51 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 8-1 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 30.12
Cases cited: TNT Skypak International (Aust) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 82 ALR 175 cited Mulherin v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCAFC 115 cited Price Street Professional Centre Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2007) 243 ALR 728 cited Branson v Commissioner of Taxation (2008) 73 ATR 864 cited Commissioner of Taxation v Brixius (1987) 16 FCR 359 applied Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Citylink Melbourne Ltd (2006) 228 CLR 1 cited P v Child Support Registrar [2014] FCAFC 98 cited Arifin v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2014] FCAFC 61 applied
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate