Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Queensland Mining Corporation Ltd v Renshaw (No 3) [2014] FCA 1126 Citation: Queensland Mining Corporation Ltd v Renshaw (No 3) [2014] FCA 1126
Parties: QUEENSLAND MINING CORPORATION LIMITED (ACN 109 962 469) v HOWARD VICTOR RENSHAW, BUTMALL PTY LIMITED (ACN 060 658 639) and 23 MARTIN PLACE PTY LTD (ACN 145 097 258
File number: NSD 1308 of 2013
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 22 October 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – Where successful plaintiff's breach contributed to need for recovery proceedings
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 200B, 200J
Cases cited: Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229 Queensland Mining Corporation Ltd v Renshaw [2014] FCA 365 (QMCL (No. 1) Queensland Mining Corporation Ltd v Renshaw (No. 2) [2014] FCA 438 (QMCL (No. 2)
Date of hearing: 5 May 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr N Furlan
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Mr P Beazley, Beazley Singleton Lawyers
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: MacKellars Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1308 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate