Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Grabovsky v Secretary, Department of Social Services (No 2) [2014] FCA 1130 Citation: Grabovsky v Secretary, Department of Social Services (No 2) [2014] FCA 1130
Appeal from: Igor Grabovsky v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2014] AATA 522
Parties: IGOR GRABOVSKY v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 854 of 2014
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 24 October 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – purported appeal from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("AAT") pursuant to s 44(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – whether appeal competent – whether question of law – whether s 39 of the Social Security Administration Act 1999 (Cth) limits the power of the AAT to remit decisions under review
Legislation: Social Security Administration Act 1999 (Cth) ss 3, 4, 7, 11, 39, 41, 42; Pt 4, Divs 2, 3, 5; cl 4, Sch 2 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) s 94 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43
Date of hearing: 21 October 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 29
Solicitor for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: Mr S Thompson of Sparke Helmore Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 854 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: IGOR GRABOVSKY
Applicant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate