Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
De Satge on behalf of the Butchulla People #2 v State of Queensland [2014] FCA 1132 Citation: De Satge on behalf of the Butchulla People #2 v State of Queensland [2014] FCA 1132
Parties: BRONWYN DE SATGE, RODERICK TOBANE, BELINDA BARROWCLIFFE, SHIRLEY BLAKE, GEMMA CRONIN, SANDRA PAGE, LURLINE LILLIAN BURKE, CEPHA ROMA AND BRETT NUTLEY ON BEHALF OF THE BUTCHULLA PEOPLE #2 v STATE OF QUEENSLAND, FRASER COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL, TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED and KINGFISHER BAY RESORT VILLAGE PTY LTD
File number: QUD 287 of 2009
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 24 October 2014
Corrigendum: 5 November 2014
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – application under s 61(1) Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ("the Act") – claim area in respect of Fraser Island in Queensland – agreement by parties under s 87 of the Act – whether Court satisfied it has power to make orders in accordance with proposed consent orders – s 87(1)(c) – whether appears to Court appropriate to make orders sought by parties – ss 87(1) and (2) – parts of claim area subject to military orders pursuant to reg 54 National Security (General) Regulations 1939 (Cth) – question of extinguishment by military order subject of Full Court of Federal Court decision in Congoo and Others on behalf of the Bar-Barrum People #4 v State of Queensland (2014) 218 FCR 358 – special leave granted to appeal Bar-Barrum decision to High Court of Australia but not yet determined – orders sought subject to right of State of Queensland to seek to vary determination in event High Court allows appeal – ss 13(1)(b) and (5) of the Act – history and anthropology of claim area and claim group – nomination of prescribed body corporate – s 57 of the Act – details of matters in s 225 of the Act set out as required by s 94A of the Act –persons holding rights comprising native title – nature and extent of native title rights and interests in relation to determination area – relationship between native title rights and other interests – whether native title rights and interests confer possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of land or waters to exclusion of all others – consideration of historical and anthropological reports– evidence of claim group members – application of s 87 of the Act – evidence of continued connection – evidence of continued adherence by members of claim group to laws and customs – evidence of active engagement in traditions – evidence of engagement in activities identified as rights and interests – evidence rights and interests arise from traditional law and customs – whether State has taken steps to satisfy itself of credible basis for application
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate