Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. (No 2) [2014] FCA 1159 Citation: Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. (No 2) [2014] FCA 1159 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Société Des Produits Nestlé SA & Anor v Christian & Anor (No.4) [2014] FCCA 2025 and Société Des Produits Nestlé SA & Anor v Christian & Anor (No. 6) [2014] FCCA 2368
Parties: JAMES WILLIAM CHRISTIAN and MARK CHARLES CHRISTIAN v SOCIÉTÉ DES PRODUITS NESTLÉ S.A. and NESTLÉ AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 000 011 316
File number(s): NSD 940 of 2014
Judge(s): YATES J
Date of judgment: 28 October 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal from a judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 120
Cases cited: Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A 2014 [FCA] 1075 Société Des Produits Nestlé SA & Anor v Christian & Anor (No. 6) [2014] FCCA 2368 Société Des Produits Nestlé SA & Anor v Christian & Anor (No. 7) [2013] FCCA 2468 The State of New South Wales v Canellis (1994) 181 CLR 309
Date of hearing: 28 October 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
First Applicant: In person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S Burley SC with Mr B Mee
Solicitor for the Respondents: Banki Haddock Fiora
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 940 of 2014
BETWEEN: JAMES WILLIAM CHRISTIAN
First Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate