Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Limited v ACPA Pty Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 1165 Citation: Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Limited v ACPA Pty Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 1165
Parties: ANCHORAGE CAPITAL PARTNERS PTY LIMITED v ACPA PTY LIMITED and ANCHORAGE CAPITAL GROUP, L.L.C.; ACPA PTY LIMITED and ANCHORAGE CAPITAL GROUP, L.L.C. v ANCHORAGE CAPITAL PARTNERS PTY LIMITED
File number: NSD 149 of 2014
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 31 October 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to set aside notice to produce unredacted versions of documents to be tendered at trial – whether redacted documents relevant to issues in the proceeding – implied undertaking to use documents only for present proceeding – where applicant company intended to provide unredacted documents to fiduciaries of company – whether fiduciaries would have conflict of interest
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 55
Cases cited: Hearne v Street (2008) 235 CLR 125 considered Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651 cited Luxottica Retail Australia Pty Ltd v Specsavers Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 793 cited
Date of hearing: 30 October 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate