Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WZATK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1174 Citation: WZATK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1174
Appeal from: WZATK v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 1344
Parties: WZATK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number(s): WAD 220 of 2014
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 5 November 2014
Date of hearing: 3 November 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person.
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr P Corbould
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 220 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: WZATK
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 5 NOVEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 220 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: WZATK
Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate