Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZTAK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1192 Citation: SZTAK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1192
Appeal from: SZTAK v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 1420
Parties: SZTAK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 791 of 2014
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 10 November 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming decision to refuse appellant protection visa – where appellant gave inconsistent evidence regarding religious beliefs – whether Tribunal failed to consider integer of appellant's claims or denied appellant procedural fairness
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Pt 7 Div 4
Cases cited: Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 73 ALD 321 cited Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 194 ALR 244 cited
Date of hearing: 3 November 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr P Bodisco
Solicitor for the Appellant: Stanford Lawyers
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms L Buchanan of the Australian Government Solicitor
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 791 of 2014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate