Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bedi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protections [2014] FCA 1197 Citation: Bedi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1197
Appeal from: Bedi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCCA 1660
Parties: RAVINDER SINGH BEDI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 398 of 2014
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 7 November 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where application for leave to appeal required – judicial review of decision to refuse Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – whether appellant had competent English as required by cl 485.215 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) r 44.12 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 55, 57, 65, 359, 359C, 360 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.15C, cl 845.215 of Sch 2
Cases cited: Bedi v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection & Anor [2014] FCCA 1660 – cited Berenguel v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 8 – considered DÉcor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 – cited Gajjar v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2013) 141 ALD 236 – cited SZQCZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 91 – cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate