Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McLay as Liquidator of Ross Holdings (WA) Pty Ltd (in liq), in the matter of Ross Holdings (WA) Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014] FCA 1208 Citation: McLay as Liquidator of Ross Holdings (WA) Pty Ltd (in liq), in the matter of Ross Holdings (WA) Pty Ltd (in liq) [2014] FCA 1208
Parties: DOUGAL MCLAY AS LIQUIDATOR OF ROSS HOLDINGS (WA) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 123 503 766) v ROSS HOLDINGS (WA) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 123 503 766)
File number(s): WAD 233 of 2012
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 31 October 2014
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application that a liquidator be released and that the company be deregistered – application that the liquidator be permitted to destroy the company books.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 480(d), 542, 542(2), 542(3)(a) Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) rr 2.8(3), 7.5
Date of hearing: 31 October 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr B Morton
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mendelawitz Morton
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 233 of 2012
IN THE MATTER OF ROSS HOLDINGS (WA) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 123 503 766) DOUGAL MCLAY AS LIQUIDATOR OF ROSS HOLDINGS (WA) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 123 503 766)
Applicant
ROSS HOLDINGS (WA) PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 123 503 766)
Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 31 october 2014 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Dougal McLay be released as liquidator of the respondent. 2. The Australian Securities and Investment Commission deregister the respondent. THE COURT DIRECTS THAT: 3. All books of the respondent and of the applicant that are relevant to the affairs of the respondent, at or subsequent to the commencement of the winding up of the respondent may be destroyed by the applicant after the deregistration of the respondent. 4. The applicant's costs in this application be a cost in the liquidation of the respondent. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate