Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shurat HaDin, Israel Law Center v Lynch (No 4) [2014] FCA 1216 Citation: Shurat HaDin, Israel Law Center v Lynch (No 4) [2014] FCA 1216
Parties: SHURAT HADIN - THE ISRAEL LAW CENTER, DAVID HANS LANGE, JONATHAN ROSE, ANDREW HAMILTON and GREEN FREEDOM LIMITED (ISRAEL COMPANY NUMBER 514 331 479) v JAKE LYNCH
File number: NSD 2235 of 2013
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 14 November 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – application to review orders made by Registrar – rehearing – whether applicant for review affected by the orders of the Registrar
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 35A, 37P Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.32, 3.11, 40.02, 40.12, 40.17, 40.19, 40.20, 40.21, 40.22
Cases cited: Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 Mazukov v University of Tasmania [2004] FCAFC 159
Date of hearing: 27 October 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 50
Attorney for the First Applicant: Mr RJ Tolchin (by telephone)
Second, Third and Fourth Applicants: No appearance
Solicitor for the Fifth Applicant: Mr APS Hamilton
Solicitors for the Respondent: Mr YR Hazan and Mr P Whitehead of Hazan Hollander
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 2235 of 2013
BETWEEN: SHURAT HADIN - THE ISRAEL LAW CENTER
First Applicant
DAVID HANS LANGE
Second Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate