Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1221 Citation: Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1221
Parties: MICHAEL TANIELU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
File number: VID 457 of 2014
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 14 November 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review of decision made by Minister personally to cancel applicant's visa pursuant to s 501(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Minister must first consider it necessary to exercise power to prevent a person from remaining in the Australian community without first affording that person natural justice before exercising power under s 501(3) – whether Minister must first consider whether to exercise power under s 501(2) before doing so under s 501(3) – whether Minister failed to have regard to a relevant consideration, namely that the legal consequence of his decision was that any representations made under s 501C(3) would be futile – whether Minister misunderstood or misconceived his statutory duty – whether Minister failed to have regard to the consequence of his decision that the applicant could never be granted a visa to return to Australia – whether Minister's conclusion that "there remains a risk, albeit a low one, that [the applicant] will re-offend in Australia" was infected by jurisdictional error because there was no evidence to support it – whether Minister's decision was not based on up to date information and/or was unreasonable
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476A, 501, 501C The Constitution s 75(v) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Sch 5
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate