Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZTQY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1240 Citation: SZTQY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1240
Parties: SZTQY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 836 of 2014
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 13 November 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from judgment of Federal Circuit Court of Australia – application for leave to appeal – no appealable error to warrant grant of leave
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1975 (Cth) s 24(1A) Federal Court Rules 2011 r 35.11 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 r 44.12
Cases cited: Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238 cited
Date of hearing: 13 November 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: Ms F Taah of Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 836 of 2014
BETWEEN: SZTQY
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J DATE OF ORDER: 13 NOVEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate