Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bianca Hope Rinehart v Georgina Hope Rinehart [2014] FCA 1241 Citation: Bianca Hope Rinehart v Georgina Hope Rinehart [2014] FCA 1241
Parties: BIANCA HOPE RINEHART and JOHN LANGLEY HANCOCK v GEORGINA HOPE RINEHART AND OTHERS NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE
File number: NSD 1124 of 2014
Judge: JACOBSON J
Date of judgment: 19 November 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for interim suppression order pursuant to s 37AI of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – Whether proceeding is an abuse of process – Whether order is necessary to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Relevance of s 8(1) and s 16(9) of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2012 (WA) in considering application for suppression in this Court PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether news articles published after the hearing date are of sufficient probative value to warrant reopening the proceeding so that they may be tendered PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Whether an injunction pursuant to s 17J of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2012 (WA), or s 23 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) is appropriate
Legislation: Commercial Arbitration Act 2012 (WA) – s 8(1), s 16(9), s 17, s 17J Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW) – s 8 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – s 140 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – s 23, s 37AI Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – r 2.32 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – s 87(2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate