Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Farey v National Australia Bank Ltd [2014] FCA 1242 Citation: Farey v National Australia Bank Ltd [2014] FCA 1242
Parties: STEVEN HAROLD FRANCIS FAREY, SUSAN ANN FAREY and FAREY ENTERPRISES PTY LTD ACN 088 629 627 v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD ACN 004 044 937
File number: VID 1459 of 2011
Judge: JACOBSON J
Date of judgment: 18 November 2014
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING – Application for orders pursuant to s 33ZF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to "open", and then after a notification period "close" the class eligible to participate in any settlement sum – Adequacy of the notices proposed to be published
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Courtney v Medtel Pty Limited (2002) 122 FCR 168 Harrison v Sandhurst Trustees Limited [2011] FCA 541 Inabu Pty Limited v Leighton Holdings Pty Limited [2014] FCA 622 McMullin v ICI Australia Operations Pty Limited (1998) 84 FCR 1 Winterford v Pfizer Australia Pty Limited [2012] FCA 1199
Date of hearing: 18 November 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr M B J Lee SC, Mr W A D Edwards
Solicitor for the Applicants: Maurice Blackburn
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J Karkar QC, Mr R Pintos-Lopez
Solicitor for the Respondent: National Australia Bank
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 1159 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate