Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCA 1268 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] FCA 1268
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v CEMENT AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 104 053 474, CEMENT AUSTRALIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD ACN 001 085 561, CEMENT AUSTRALIA (QUEENSLAND) PTY LTD FORMERLY QUEENSLAND CEMENT LTD ACN 009 658 520, POZZOLANIC ENTERPRISES PTY LTD ACN 010 367 898, POZZOLANIC INDUSTRIES PTY LTD ACN 010 608 947, CHRISTOPHER GUY LEON and CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN WHITE
File number: QUD 295 of 2008
Judge: GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 25 November 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an application for an order that three affidavits filed in reply for the purposes of a pecuniary penalty hearing not be admitted into evidence PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an application to set aside a subpoena
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 37M, 37P Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) v Cement Australia Pty Ltd (2013) 210 ALR 165; [2013] FCA 909 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 689
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate