Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oswal v Apache Corporation (No 4) [2014] FCA 1291 Citation: Oswal v Apache Corporation (No 4) [2014] FCA 1291
Parties: PANKAJ OSWAL v APACHE CORPORATION
File number: WAD 389 of 2013
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 27 November 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for further discovery of specific documents and categories of documents pursuant to r 20.21 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), alternatively r 20.15 - in the alternative, application for proper discovery pursuant to earlier orders of the Court – whether or not documents post-dating the last dates when it is alleged that several misrepresentations were made are discoverable – whether or not trial dates should be vacated
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 51A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 20.14, 20.15, 20.21
Cases cited: Bill Acceptance Corporation Ltd v GWA Ltd (1983) 78 FLR 171 Dockpride Pty Ltd v Subiaco Redevelopment Authority [2005] WASC 211 Fubilan Catering Services Limited v Compass Group (Australia) Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1205 Lewarne v Momentum Productions Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1136 McGrath v Australian Naturalcare Products Pty Ltd (2008) 165 FCR 230 North East Equity Pty Ltd v Proud Nominees Pty Ltd (2012) 285 ALR 217 Siminton v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority [2008] FCAFC 90 Tag Pacific Ltd v McSweeney (1992) 34 FCR 438 Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman Networks Ltd (2006) 150 FCR 110 Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland (1998) 89 FCR 78
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate