Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v iiNet Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 1320 Citation: Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v iiNet Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 1320
Parties: DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC v IINET LIMITED, INTERNODE PTY LTD, AMNET BROADBAND PTY LTD, DODO SERVICES PTY LTD, ADAM INTERNET PTY LTD and WIDEBAND NETWORKS PTY LTD
File number: NSD 1051 of 2014
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 3 December 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – witness resident overseas required for cross-examination – whether witness should be required to attend hearing in person
Cases cited: Unilever Australia Ltd v Revlon Australia Pty Ltd (No 4) [2014] FCA 1074 Date of hearing: 2 December 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr I Pike SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Marque Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr R Lancaster SC and Mr C Burgess
Solicitor for the Respondents: Thomson Geer
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1051 of 2014
BETWEEN: DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC
Applicant
AND: IINET LIMITED
First Respondent
INTERNODE PTY LTD
Second Respondent
AMNET BROADBAND PTY LTD
Third Respondent
DODO SERVICES PTY LTD
Fourth Respondent
ADAM INTERNET PTY LTD
Fifth Respondent
WIDEBAND NETWORKS PTY LTD
Sixth Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 2 DECEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate