Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1326 Citation: Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1326
Parties: MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680 v SINO IRON PTY LTD ACN 058 429 708, KOREAN STEEL PTY LTD ACN 058 429 600, CITIC PACIFIC LTD and CITIC PACIFIC MINING MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ACN 119 578 371; SINO IRON PTY LTD ACN 058 429 708 and KOREAN STEEL PTY LTD ACN 058 429 600; MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680
File number: WAD 110 of 2013
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 5 December 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory injunctions in relation to termination notices – whether trial dates should be vacated – confidentiality orders sought in respect of identified materials
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 s 37M, s 37N
Date of hearing: 1 December 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 70
Counsel for the Applicant and Cross-Respondent: Mr S Couper QC
Solicitor for the Applicant and Cross-Respondent: HopgoodGanim
Counsel for the Respondents and Cross-Claimants: Dr AS Bell SC and Mr SC Wong
Solicitor for the Respondents and Cross-Claimants: Allens
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 110 of 2013
BETWEEN: MINERALOGY PTY LTD ACN 010 582 680
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate