Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Blue Gentian LLC v Product Management Group Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1331 Citation: Blue Gentian LLC v Product Management Group Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1331
Parties: BLUE GENTIAN LLC and BRAND DEVELOPERS AUST PTY LTD (ACN 115 139 565) v PRODUCT MANAGEMENT GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 131 987 034); PRODUCT MANAGEMENT GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 131 987 034); BLUE GENTIAN LLC and BRAND DEVELOPERS AUST PTY LTD (ACN 115 139 565)
File number: VID 317 of 2013
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 8 December 2014
Catchwords: PATENTS – construction – direct and indirect infringement PATENTS – validity – novelty – innovative step for innovation patents – fair basis – sufficiency – clarity PATENTS – whether exclusive licence
Legislation: Patents Act 1952 (Cth) Patents Act 1990 (Cth)
Cases cited: Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd (2013) 304 ALR 1 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd (2014) 312 ALR 1 Beadcrete Pty Ltd v Fei Yu (t/as Jewels 4 Pools) (No 2) (2013) 100 IPR 188 Blue Gentian LLC & Anor v Tristar Products (UK) Ltd & Anor [2013] EWHC 4098 (Pat) Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v Apotex Ltd (No 5) (2013) 104 IPR 23 D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc (2014) 313 ALR 627 Delnorth Pty Ltd v Dura-Post (Aust) Pty Ltd (2008) 78 IPR 463 Dura-Post (Aust) Pty Ltd v Delnorth Pty Ltd (2007) 177 FCR 239 E Mishan & Sons Inc & Anor v Supertek Canada Inc & Ors [2014] FC 326 Fei Yu (t/as Jewels 4 Pools) v Beadcrete Pty Ltd (2014) 107 IPR 516 Flour Oxidizing Company Ltd v Carr & Co Ltd [1908] 25 RPC 428 Grant v Australian Temporary Fencing Pty Ltd (2003) 59 IPR 170 H Lundbeck A/S v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2009) 177 FCR 151 Jupiters Ltd v Neurizon Pty Ltd (2005) 222 ALR 155 Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Arico Trading International Pty Ltd (2001) 207 CLR 1 Kinabalu Investments Pty Ltd v Barron & Rawson Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 178 Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (2004) 217 CLR 274 Martin v Scribal Pty Ltd (1954) 92 CLR 17 Meyers Taylor Pty Ltd v Vicarr Industries Ltd (1977) 137 CLR 228 Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd (1980) 144 CLR 253 Pharmacia Italia SpA v Interpharma Pty Ltd (2005) 67 IPR 397 Ramset Fasteners (Australia) Pty Ltd v Advanced Building systems Pty Ltd (1999) 164 ALR 239 Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (2013) 101 IPR 11 Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150 Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control Technologies Pty Ltd (2000) 177 ALR 231 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238 Uprising Dragon Ltd v Benedict Trading & Shipping Pty Ltd (1987) 16 FCR 93 Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Ltd v SARB Management Group Pty Ltd (No 2) (2013) 101 IPR 496 Wake Forest University Health Sciences v Smith & Nephew Pty Ltd (No. 2) (2011) 92 IPR 496 Zetco Pty Ltd v Austworld Commodities Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 84
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate