Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Fraser v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1333 Citation: Fraser v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1333
Parties: DYLAN REID FRASER v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
File number: NSD 444 of 2014
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 9 December 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – decision by Minister to cancel applicant's visa pursuant to Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501 – whether Minister failed adequately to assess the applicant's risk of harm to the Australian community MIGRATION – decision by Minister to cancel applicant's visa pursuant to Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501 –comments made publicly by Minister in relation to visa cancellation powers – whether Minister's decision affected by apprehended bias
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501, s 501G
Cases cited: Anderson v Director-General of the Department of Environment and Climate Change (2008) 251 ALR 633 cited Belmorgan Property Development Pty Ltd v GPT RE Ltd (2007) 153 LGERA 450 cited Elias v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 123 FCR 499 cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh (2004) 139 FCR 505 considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Nystrom (2006) 228 CLR 556 cited MZAGK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1190 cited NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 1 considered Tanielu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 673 considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate