Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd v Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC [2014] FCA 1335 Citation: FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd v Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC [2014] FCA 1335
Appeal from: Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC v FMG Pilbara Pty Ltd and Another [2014] NNTTA 14
Parties: FMG PILBARA PTY LTD v YINDJIBARNDI ABORIGINAL CORPORATION RNTBC and STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA v YINDJIBARNDI ABORIGINAL CORPORATION RNTBC (AS TRUSTEE FOR, AND ON BEHALF OF, THE YINDJIBARNDI PEOPLE) and FMG PILBARA PTY LTD
File numbers: WAD 54 of 2014 WAD 55 of 2014
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 8 December 2014
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – appeal from National Native Title Tribunal – future act – expedited procedure – proposed grant of exploration licences – consideration by Tribunal of risk of interference to sites of particular significance to native title claimants under s 237(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – meaning of 'interference' – whether the meaning of 'interference' in s 237(b) is the same as in s 237(a) – whether interference will ordinarily be physical – content of statutory obligation to give reasons in relation to a finding under s 237 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether Tribunal required to stipulate the precise nature, type and quality of interference likely to occur – whether onus is on the native title claimants to demonstrate how the interference will result – standard of probability – whether a finding that interference 'may occur' is consistent with there being a 'real chance or risk' of interference ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether there was sufficient evidence to support the Tribunal's finding that inadvertent interference may occur under s 237(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate