Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2014] FCA 1339 Citation: MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2014] FCA 1339
Parties: MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177 v MALCOLM STEWART GILMOUR and MAGIL NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 059 607 (IN LIQ); MALCOLM STEWART GILMOUR and MAGIL NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 059 607 (IN LIQ); MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177 and ALBERTO CESARIO VINCIGUERRA
File numbers: WAD 256 of 2010
Judges: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 9 December 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – appropriate costs order – Calderbank offers made by plaintiff and defendants in derivative proceeding – whether refusal of settlement offers unreasonable in the circumstances
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) R 25.14
Cases cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93; [1975] 3 All ER 333 MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Gilmour [2014] FCA 990
Date of hearing: 11 November 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 53
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr CS Williams
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Solomon Brothers
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr KA Dundo
Solicitor for the Defendants: HopgoodGanim
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 256 of 2010
BETWEEN: MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177
Plaintiff
MALCOLM STEWART GILMOUR
First Cross-Claimant
MAGIL NOMINEES PTY LTD ACN 009 059 607 (IN LIQ)
Second Cross-Claimant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate