Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hodges v Waters (No 6) [2014] FCA 1343 Citation: Hodges v Waters (No 6) [2014] FCA 1343
Parties: CHARLES HODGES & MARK HODGES AS TRUSTEES OF THE CHARLES HODGES SUPERANNUATION FUND v ANDREA JANE WATERS, KPMG, WELLINGTON INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED, OCTAVIAR LIMITED (ADMINISTRATOR APPOINTED), GUY HUTCHINGS, JOHN ARTHUR WHATELEY, JACK SIMON DIAMOND, CRAIG ROBERT WHITE, DEBORAH BEALE, STEVEN KRIS KYLING, STUART ROBERTSON PRICE, MICHAEL GORDON HISCOCK, MICHAEL CHRISTODOULOU KING, PAUL JOSEPH MANKA, FERNANDO ESTEBAN, RAYMOND KELLERMAN, DAVID MARK ANDERSON, OCTAVIAR LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 107 863 390 and OCTAVIAR ADMINISTRATION PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 101 069 390
File number: NSD 324 of 2009
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 8 December 2014
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33V
Date of hearing: 8 December 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 2
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr MBJ Lee SC and Mr WAD Edwards
Solicitor for the Applicants: Johnson Winter & Slattery Lawyers
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: Mr J Lockhart SC and Mr JA Arnott
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Allens
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 324 of 2009
BETWEEN: CHARLES HODGES & MARK HODGES AS TRUSTEES OF THE CHARLES HODGES SUPERANNUATION FUND
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate