Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Luo v Zhai (No 2) [2014] FCA 1367 Citation: Luo v Zhai (No 2) [2014] FCA 1367
Parties: XIANGNAN LUO v SUTAO ZHAI and JANTOM FURNITURE PTY LTD ACN 092 171 634
File number: NSD 1035 of 2013
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 11 December 2014
Legislation: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 37A
Cases cited: Luo v Zhai (No 1) [2014] FCA 1296
Date of hearing: 11 December 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr C King
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian International Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr G McGrath SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: Jurisbridge Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1035 of 2013
BETWEEN: XIANGNAN LUO
Applicant
AND: SUTAO ZHAI
First Respondent
JANTOM FURNITURE PTY LTD ACN 092 171 634
Second Respondent
JUDGE: PERRAM J DATE OF ORDER: 11 DECEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant's statement of claim filed 20 November 2014 be struck out. 2. The application filed 5 December 2014 be otherwise dismissed. 3. The applicant pay the costs of today of the proposed third respondent and the proposed fourth respondent. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1035 of 2013
BETWEEN: XIANGNAN LUO
Applicant
AND: SUTAO ZHAI
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate