Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v AGL South Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1369 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v AGL South Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1369
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v AGL SOUTH AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
File number: SAD 355 of 2013
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 15 December 2014
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – false or misleading statements – electricity consumers offered energy plans featuring percentage discounts off of energy usage charges – consumers on energy plans with discounts had their rates increased differentially – whether later representations that consumers' discounts continued to apply were false or misleading – whether omission to disclose certain information about rate increases was misleading or deceptive
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 4(2), 155, Sch 2 ss 18, 29 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52 and 53
Cases cited: Accounting Systems 2000 (Developments) Pty Ltd v CCH Australia Ltd (1993) 42 FCR 470 Apotex Pty Ltd v Les Laboratoires Servier (No 2) [2008] FCA 607 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 634 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dukemaster Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 682 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jewellery Group Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 848; (2012) 293 ALR 335 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1254 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60; (2004) 218 CLR 592 Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Ltd [2000] HCA 12, (2000) 202 CLR 45 Clifford v Vegas Enterprises Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 135 Fraser v NRMA Holdings Ltd (1995) 55 FCR 452 Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2013] HCA 1; (2013) 249 CLR 435 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60; (2004) 218 CLR 592 Jewellery Group Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2013] FCAFC 144 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1572; (2000) 104 FCR 564 McWilliam's Wines Pty Ltd v McDonald's System of Australia Pty Ltd (1980) 49 FLR 455 Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd v Cassidy [2003] FCAFC 289; (2003) 135 FCR 1 Miller & Associates Insurance Broking Pty Ltd v BMW Australia Finance Ltd [2010] HCA 31; (2010) 241 CLR 357 National Exchange Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2004] FCAFC 90 New South Wales Lotteries Corporation Pty Ltd v Kuzmanovski [2011] FCAFC 106, (2011) 195 FCR 234 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52; (2004) 219 CLR 165
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate