Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Latteria Holdings Pty Ltd v Corcoran Parker Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 1378 Citation: Latteria Holdings Pty Ltd v Corcoran Parker Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 1378
Parties: LATTERIA HOLDINGS PTY LTD v CORCORAN PARKER PTY LTD and DARREN ASKEW
File number: VID 97 of 2014
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 19 December 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for hearing and determination of separate question – whether "just and convenient" – whether appropriate for Court to determine separate question based on assumptions of fact and law – application refused
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Part VIA ss 87CB, 87CH, Sch 2 s 18 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic) s 9 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 79 Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) Part IVAA ss 24AI, 24AL Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 29 r 2 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) div 30.1, rr 30.01, 39.05
Cases cited: ABN AMRO Bank NV v Bathurst Regional Council (2014) 309 ALR 445; [2014] FCAFC 65 Australian Energy Regulator v Snowy Hydro Ltd [2014] FCA 1013 AWB Ltd v Cole (No 2) (2006) 233 ALR 453; [2006] FCA 913 BHPB Freight Pty Ltd v Cosco Oceania Chartering Pty Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCA 1656 Dartberg Pty Ltd v Wealthcare Financial Planning Pty Ltd (2007) 164 FCR 450; [2007] FCA 1216 Latteria Holdings Pty Ltd v Corcoran Parker Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 880 Olbers v Commonwealth (No 3) [2003] FCA 651 Rainsford v Victoria (2005) 144 FCR 279; [2005] FCAFC 163 Reading Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Mutual Provident Society (1999) 217 ALR 495; [1999] FCA 718 Rod Investments (Vic) Pty Ltd v Abeyratne (No 2) [2009] VSC 278 Save the Ridge Inc v Commonwealth (2005) 147 FCR 97; [2005] FCAFC 203 Spirits International BV v Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport (2011) 91 IPR 438; [2011] FCAFC 69 Street v Luna Park Sydney Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 697 Tallglen Pty Ltd v Pay TV Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 22 ACSR 130 Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board (2001) 206 CLR 1; [2001] HCA 19 Wealthsure Pty Ltd v Selig (2014) 221 FCR 1; [2014] FCAFC 64
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate