Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. (No 3) [2014] FCA 1395 Citation: Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. (No 3) [2014] FCA 1395
Parties: JAMES WILLIAM CHRISTIAN v Société DES PRODUITS Nestlé S.A., Nestlé AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 000 011 316, PREMIER NUTRITION CORPORATION and POST FOODS AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
File number(s): NSD 940 of 2014
Judge(s): YATES J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for change of venue for the hearing of an appeal
Cases cited: Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. & Anor v Christian & Anor (No. 4) [2014] FCCA 2025 Christian v Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. (No 2) [2014] FCA 1159
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Appellant: In person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S Burley SC with Mr B Mee
Solicitor for the Respondents: Banki Haddock Fiora
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 940 of 2014
BETWEEN: JAMES WILLIAM CHRISTIAN
Appellant and Cross-Respondent
AND: SOCIÉTÉ DES PRODUITS Nestlé S.A.
First Respondent and Cross-Appellant
Nestlé AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 000 011 316
Second Respondent and Cross-Appellant
PREMIER NUTRITION CORPORATION
Third Respondent and Cross-Appellant
POST FOODS AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
Fourth Respondent and Cross-Appellant
JUDGE: YATES J DATE OF ORDER: 22 DECEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate