Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Unilever Australia Ltd v Revlon Australia Pty Ltd (No 6) [2014] FCA 1409 Citation: Unilever Australia Ltd v Revlon Australia Pty Ltd (No 6) [2014] FCA 1409
Parties: UNILEVER AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 004 050 828 v REVLON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 095 360 731
File number: NSD 508 of 2014
Judge: GLEESON J
Date of judgment: 9 December 2014
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – objection to admissibility of respondent's evidence under s 135(a) of Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – whether probative value substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice – where respondent has not tendered all relevant material – objection upheld
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 135
Cases cited: La Trobe Capital & Mortgage Corporation Ltd v Hay Property Consultants Pty Ltd (2011) 190 FCR 299 Dyldam Developments Pty Ltd v Jones [2008] NSWCA 56
Date of hearing: 9 December 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr R Cobden SC with Mr N Furlan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Baker & McKenzie
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Hall SC with Dr B Kremer
Solicitor for the Respondent: King + Wood Mallesons
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 508 of 2014
BETWEEN: UNILEVER AUSTRALIA LTD ACN 004 050 828
Applicant
AND: REVLON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 095 360 731
Respondent
JUDGE: GLEESON J DATE OF RULING: 9 DECEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT RULES THAT:
1. Evidence proposed to be given by Dr Heng (Harry) Cai to the effect that hydrogen peroxide included in the respondent's Mitchum Clinical products is encapsulated and in a stabilised form not be admitted into evidence. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate