Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Coshott v Coshott [2014] FCA 1418 Citation: Coshott v Coshott [2014] FCA 1418
Parties: JAMES COSHOTT and LJILJANA COSHOTT v ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT, A BANKRUPT and MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE IN HIS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT, A BANKRUPT; MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE IN HIS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT, A BANKRUPT; JAMES COSHOTT, LJILJANA COSHOTT, ROBERT GILBERT COSHOTT, A BANKRUPT and SCHLOTZSKY'S NOMINEE COMPANY PTY LIMITED
File number: NSD 1412 of 2009
Judge: JACOBSON J
Date of judgment: 18 December 2014
Catchwords: CONVEYANCING – Application for stay of execution of Writ of Possession – Powers of the Federal Court Sherriff and Deputy Sherriff – Requirement to provide notice pursuant to s 111 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) – Effect of delay in commencing proceeding
Legislation: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) s 111 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 18N, s 18P Federal Court Rules 2011 r 40.10, r 40.41
Cases cited: ABC v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57
Date of hearing: 18 December 2014
Date of last submissions: 18 December 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr A Cheshire
Solicitor for the Applicants: Martin Place Lawyers
Counsel for the trustees for sale: Mr S Mullette Solicitor for the trustees for sale: Matthews Folbigg Pty Ltd
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate