Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZTUL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1427 Citation: SZTUL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1427
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: SZTUL v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2014] FCCA 1985
Parties: SZTUL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 912 of 2014
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 26 November 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Refugee Review Tribunal – appeal from Federal Circuit Court of Australia – whether to grant leave to appeal – whether to grant adjournment on grounds of further time required to seek pro bono legal assistance – absence of reasonably arguable case if leave to appeal were granted Held: absence of legal representation not in itself a ground for adjournment – application for leave be dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 91R
Cases cited: Dobson v Australian Postal Corporation [2013] FCA 320 cited Singh v Owners Strata Plan No 11723 (No 4) [2012] FCA 1180 cited SZTBE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1230 cited Tinkler v Elliott [2012] EWCA Civ 1289 cited WZAPN v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 947 considered
Date of hearing: 26 November 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 27
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate