Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DB Marketing Solutions Pty Ltd (formerly known as Auto Xtreme Electronics Pty Ltd) v Cause (No 2) [2014] FCA 1429 Citation: DB Marketing Solutions Pty Ltd (formerly known as Auto Xtreme Electronics Pty Ltd) v Cause (No 2) [2014] FCA 1429
Parties: DB MARKETING SOLUTIONS PTY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS AUTO XTREME ELECTRONICS PTY LTD) (ACN 105 423 014), WORLDMARK GROUP HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ACN 144 505 199) and MOTOR ONE GROUP PTY LTD ACN 097 188 219 v TRENT DAVID CAUSE, ASHLEY GRANT CAUSE and ON HIGHWAY ELECTRONICS (A PARTNERSHIP) (ABN 67 918 445 405)
File number: QUD 508 of 2014
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 9 December 2014
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – interlocutory application – whether there is a cause for dissolution or variation of injunctive orders – whether evidence not previously before the Court before primary judgment warrants dissolution or variation of interlocutory injunction
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 182, 183
Cases cited: Austen & Butta Ltd v Shell Australia Ltd (1992) 10 ACSR 556 cited P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 2) (2009) 255 ALR 466 followed
Date of hearing: 9 December 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr NM Cooke
Solicitor for the Applicants: Hunt & Hunt Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondents: Snowton Saje Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 508 of 2014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate