Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Motorcycle Aftermarket Spares Pty Ltd v Tamworth Cycle Tune Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1433 Citation: Motorcycle Aftermarket Spares Pty Ltd v Tamworth Cycle Tune Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1433
Parties: MOTORCYCLE AFTERMARKET SPARES PTY LTD ACN 165 022 097 v TAMWORTH CYCLE TUNE PTY LTD ACN 166 053 265, MOTORCYCLE PARTS ONLINE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 166 053 345 and STEPHEN JAMES NAGLE
File number(s): QUD 114 of 2014
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 23 December 2014
Catchwords: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – consideration of an assessment of damages arising out of infringements of copyright in photographs and particular trade text
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), ss 115(2) and 115(4)
Cases cited: Futuretronics.com.au Pty Ltd v Graphix Labels Pty Ltd (No 2) (2008) 76 IPR 763 – cited Dynamic Supplies Pty Ltd v Tonnex International Pty Ltd (No 3) (2014) 312 ALR 705 – cited
Date of hearing: 22 December 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr M T Woodhead, Dundas Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: The third respondent appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 114 of 2014
BETWEEN: MOTORCYCLE AFTERMARKET SPARES PTY LTD ACN 165 022 097
Applicant
AND: TAMWORTH CYCLE TUNE PTY LTD ACN 166 053 265
First Respondent
MOTORCYCLE PARTS ONLINE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ACN 166 053 345
Second Respondent
STEPHEN JAMES NAGLE
Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate