Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chesnokova v The University of Adelaide [2014] FCA 1436 Citation: Chesnokova v The University of Adelaide [2014] FCA 1436
Parties: TATYANA CHESNOKOVA v THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE
File number: SAD 314 of 2014
Judge: WHITE J
Date of judgment: 8 December 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Interlocutory injunction – injunction restraining employer from terminating applicant's employment – application refused
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 340, 341, 342, 361
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill [2006] HCA 46; (2006) 227 CLR 56 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 971 Construction, Forestry Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 563
Date of hearing: 8 December 2014
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 50
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms C Ronalds SC
Solicitors for the Applicant: PCC Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Douglas
Solicitors for the Respondent: Minter Ellison
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 314 of 2014
BETWEEN: TATYANA CHESNOKOVA
Applicant
AND: THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE
Respondent
JUDGE: WHITE J DATE OF ORDER: 8 DECEMBER 2014 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The Applicant's interlocutory application filed in the Federal Circuit Court on 29 October 2014 be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate